One of the Future Fashion Trends According to Grace Gordon

Fashion Trends That Were Banned Throughout History

Keystone/Getty Images

Fashion trends go in and out of style, but sometimes the reason for a particular trend's fall from grace is because no one is immune to habiliment it. Believe it or not, some of the most iconic looks of all time have been banned at some signal in history. Sometimes the ban is for political reasons and sometimes the reason is just plain empty-headed. Taking a wait at some of history'south virtually baffling banned fashion trends tells usa not just about the times, but it likewise proves that in that location's more to fashion than just looking skilful.

While many of the styles on this list have outlived their bans and are now in society's proficient graces, some of them have only been prohibited recently. From article of clothing to hairstyles, even some of the almost beloved fashions in history haven't been immune to existence banned. Here is a look at some of the almost controversial trends in history that have been bailiwick to banning.

Pants

Nixon/Getty Images

Women wearing pants is a fairly contempo development in the history of fashion. The reason it took and so long for them to become a staple in women'due south wardrobes, though, is more than complex than pants simply taking a while to come up into faddy. Women take really had to fight for the right to article of clothing pants as they were traditionally considered a men's fashion item. Pants for women first started becoming mainstream subsequently Earth State of war I, as many women had grown accepted to wearing pants to the factory jobs they took to supercede the men who went to state of war.

In 1939, Vogue began showcasing women wearing pants, spurring the growth of the style further. Also helping popularize the look was actress Katherine Hepburn. Past the mid-20th century, many women were wearing pants but the mode was all the same somewhat controversial and, in some cases, banned. Universities were allowed to prohibit female students from wearing pants until 1972. There were rules until 1993 prohibiting women from wearing pants on the floor of the U.Southward. Senate. Incredibly, information technology wasn't until 2016 that British Airways cabin crew members were finally allowed to wear pants to work after a two-year battle with the airline.

Tartans

Jens Schlueter/Getty Images

Ask someone to describe a traditional Scottish men's outfit and they'll likely describe a plaid kilt. These kilts, made from a type of woven cloth called tartan, are such a powerful symbol of Scottish identity that, in the 18th century, tartans were fifty-fifty banned for a fourth dimension. The Clothes Act of 1746 was an attempt to punish Highland Scots after many of the clans in the Scottish Highlands participated in a series of unsuccessful uprisings which attempted to restore the Scottish Stuart dynasty to the British throne.

After the rebelling clans suffered a bitter defeat at the Battle of Culloden in 1746, the British government wanted to prevent whatever future uprisings. They so passed the deed, which made it illegal to wear tartans, forth with other traditional vesture. This was done in the promise that information technology would subdue the rebellious Scottish clans by stripping them of their cultural identity, thereby weakening the clans and preventing them from rising up again.

The ban on tartans remained in identify until 1782. While the tartan lives on, the ban, forth with the cruel defeat, did weaken the clan system. The Boxing of Culloden marked the end of the last major uprising.

Purple vesture

Kevin Winter/Getty Images

In the 14th century, England passed a sumptuary law called A Statute Concerning Nutrition and Dress. The law governed what people ate and wore. Poor families, for example, were forbidden from wearing silk and fur, while merely lords could wearable a jacket that revealed their knees. The law too regulated the wearing of the colour royal, which was reserved for royals. This law recalled ancient Roman police which also forbade the general population from wearing purple. Romans who violated the decree were field of study to the death penalty.

While historical laws might have prohibited commoners from wearing majestic, it's unlikely that the average person would have been able to afford a majestic garment anyhow. Purple dye was notoriously difficult and expensive to produce for much of history. It wasn't until the mid-19th century that synthetic royal dye was produced, making the hue widely available to the general public for the first time.

Kingfisher feathers

Shutterstock

It's hard to believe that something as innocuous as feathers could be prohibited, but that's what happened to kingfisher feathers in Communist china during the Ming dynasty. The feathers were prized for their dazzler and quite difficult to obtain, making them highly coveted as decorations also every bit extremely valuable. They were so cute that they were even worked into metallic jewelry in an art form known every bit tian-tsui. Kingfisher feathers were also woven into headdresses that were worn by noblewomen at weddings and special occasions.

During the Ming dynasty, austerity measures were put into identify. Many appurtenances during this era were prohibited to the boilerplate citizen. Amongst them were gold thread and sure fabrics and patterns. The opulent kingfisher feathers were also kept out of the hands of all but the most high-ranking royals and authorities officials during this fourth dimension. Even afterward austerity measures were relaxed, kingfisher feathers all the same remained the privilege of the highest classes of gild.

Shorts

Keystone/Getty Images

Who wears short shorts? If 20th century sartorial sticklers had their way, no one would be wearing the abbreviated garment. NPR cited several historical newspapers that covered cities that take tried to abolish shorts over the years. In 1938, Honesdale, Penn. banned shorts on the grounds that partially uncovered legs were considered immodest, reported the Moberly Monitor-Alphabetize. The New York Times reported that the city of Monahans, Texas prohibited women from walking down public streets in shorts in 1944. The following twelvemonth, several municipalities in Illinois also prevented women from wearing shorts in public, wrote the Associated Printing. In 1959, the same paper wrote that Plattsburgh, N.Y. banned anyone over the age of 16 from wearing shorts in public. Offenders could be fined $25 or imprisoned for 25 days.

The boxing against shorts connected on. Notably, it wasn't until the 1980s that the The states Golf Association finally lifted a ban on golfing shorts.

Corsets

Hulton Annal/Getty Images

Perchance one of the nearly oppressive fashions of all fourth dimension, corsets helped women achieve a smaller waist and impeccable posture. That doesn't audio besides bad, merely corsets also restricted a wearer's ability to move and could also make it difficult to breathe. In the 19th century, several Eastern European countries banned the undergarment, but it would have America longer to follow adjust. Surprisingly, it wasn't the discomfort brought on by corsets that led to their ban in the U.S. in the early 20th century. Instead, it was a war that helped reshape women's shape article of clothing.

During WWI, there was a shortage of metallic. As corsets at this time were made primarily from this fabric, the State of war Industries Lath, a wartime government agency, asked women to stop wearing corsets. By giving upward their corsets, American women managed to direct 28,000 pounds of metallic towards the war — plenty to build a battleship.

This temporary ban helped bring about the downfall of the corset as, by the fourth dimension the metal was no longer needed for the war, women had adjusted to a more comfortable lifestyle. Inside a few years, corsets were mostly replaced past the modern bra.

Durags

Jason Merritt/Getty Images

The durag is a rag or scarf worn to embrace pilus and is nearly commonly associated with black men. The await became popular in the 1970s as a style of keeping hair in place and frizz-free. From at that place, it evolved into a fashion staple and, in modernistic times, has been sported by celebs like Rihanna and Jay-Z.

In 2018, a Massachusetts lease school, where most durag-wearers were immature black men, banned students from wearing them. The school's dean of students and schoolhouse culture, Shauna-Kaye Clarke, apparently believed the trend was "a straight component of the school to prison house pipeline." In an electronic mail to the student body (viaThe Daily Item), Clarke wrote, "Unfortunately, they are also cogitating of some gang culture." She connected, "And they can recede your hairline. That'southward not setting you upwards for success."

Critics said that blackness students were being unfairly targeted by the policy, and students felt like they were having their culture censored. The schoolhouse eventually gave in to pressure, partially repealing the ban by assuasive students to wear the head covering on campus as long as they were removed by the time classes started.

Bobbed hair

Keystone/Getty Images

Fifty-fifty today, if a adult female cuts off all her hair, it's considered a bold (and frequently risky) mode choice. There was a time, however, when a adult female cutting off her pilus could actually face pushback from society. Bobbed pilus started cropping upwards in the early on 20th century, but the style really became popular in the 1920s. Short hair wasn't merely a mode trend, simply it was also a manner of defying long-held gender norms.

"I consider getting rid of our long hair 1 of the many little shackles that women have cast aside in their passage to freedom," actress Mary Gordon told Pictorial Review in 1927 (via Fashionista). "Whatever helps their emancipation, however small it may seem, is well worth while."

Not everyone was on board with women declaring their emancipation. Preachers spoke confronting the tendency, and pamphlets alarm of the supposed health risks involved with bobbed hair were distributed. Many schools even banned young women from cutting off their hair.

Western hairstyles

Evening Standard/Getty Images

In Iran, hairstyles are oft even more restrictive than in the United States. There, western hairstyles have been banned since 2010 as they are thought by some people to be anti-Islamic. Banned hairstyles include the mullet and the ponytail. The country took things further in 2015, banning other haircuts and beauty trends that were said to be "devil worshiping," according to The Guardian, although they didn't provide a list of hairstyles that fit that criteria.

"Devil-worshiping hairstyles are forbidden," the caput of the country's barbers' union, Mostafa Govahi, told the press (via The Guardian). "Any shop that cuts pilus in the devil worshiping fashion will be harshly dealt with and their [license] revoked. Tattoos, conservatory treatments and plucking eyebrows [for men] are also forbidden."

In a carve up interview, Govahi said that Iran's barbers have a list of canonical hairstyles that tin can be given to men. "I won't let such wrongful western styles equally long every bit I'm in this position," he said.

High heels

Shutterstock

Loftier heels might exist stylish, only they aren't exactly comfy. That'due south not the reason they're banned, though, at to the lowest degree non in the city of Carmel, Calif. There, you can't wear heels with a base of less than a square inch or heels that are more two inches loftier unless you go a allow. The law came into beingness in 1963 to protect the city from lawsuits as tree roots pushing through the pavement arrive uneven and thus easy to trip on. Fortunately, the permits are available for gratuitous, and, even if y'all don't become 1, the constabulary don't issue citations for heel wearers.

Loftier heel fans aren't so lucky in Greece. In 2009, officials banned high heels from beingness worn at ancient sites considering of the impairment the shoes tin cause.

In some cases, high heel bans have been nigh preventing women from being forced to wear loftier heels. In 2019, Alberta, Canada made it illegal for companies to require employees to vesture any shoes that could pose a condom risk, effectively banning the mandatory wearing of loftier heels. The Philippines passed a similar law in 2017, prohibiting companies from requiring women to clothing loftier heels to piece of work.

Leggings

Shutterstock

Whether or non you believe that leggings are pants, you likely haven't realized but how heated the argue over the tight wearable trend is. Leggings take been around for decades, but hatred for them didn't reach ban-worthy levels until the 2010s. A lot of the hatred for leggings can be chalked up to the patriarchy. Some people are concerned that the shape-revealing clothes tin can be also enticing. "I thought of all the other men around and behind us who couldn't help but encounter their behinds," wrote Maryann White in a letter to the editor of the Academy of Notre Dame'due south educatee paper, The Observer, in 2019. White had attended church services at the university and was scandalized by immature women wearing leggings as pants.

In 2012, a schoolhouse in Canada banned leggings on campus. That same year, a Minnesota school principal wrote a letter of the alphabet to parents complaining about the "distracting" attire and asking them to urge their children to cover upward. In 2014, a North Dakota high school took things 1 step farther past comparison students who wear leggings to sex workers.

Sagging pants

Joe Raedle/Getty Images

People haven't but come downwards on pants for being too tight, but they take as well criticized pants for existence likewise loose. In 2008, the Chicago suburb of Lynwood banned pants worn and then loose they dropped below the waist in a way known every bit "sagging." Other towns and cities across the country quickly followed suit. "It's not correct," Eugene Williams, the town's mayor, told the Chicago Tribune. "Information technology'southward ugly and stupid. Tin't you respect my lilliputian kid or my mother when you lot're out? I wouldn't walk around my own house with my pants hanging downwards — why practice I accept to have that out in public?"

In 2011, Florida passed a beak that required schools to subject students whose pants sagged depression enough to show their underwear. That same year, public buses in Fort Worth, Texas began turning abroad passengers wearing sagging pants.

The fight against the trend is ongoing. In 2018, South Carolina lawmakers proposed a bill to outlaw the tendency. The following year, police chased a immature human being for violating a ban on sagging pants in Shreveport, La., opening fire after they saw he was carrying a gun. While the man's death was ruled a suicide, the incident led to demands to repeal the ban. In June 2019, the ban was repealed.

JoJo bows

Amy Sussman/Getty Images

As far as fashion trends become, hair bows seem innocent enough. Bows have long held a cutesy appeal and are traditionally associated with young girls, although, when they first came into vogue in the 17th century, it was fashionable for both men and women to stone them. In the 2010s, Dance Moms reality star JoJo Siwa brought pilus bows into the 21st century with the oversized bows she favors becoming so popular that tweens scrambled to copy the look. Siwa eventually came out with her ain line of hair bows dubbed "JoJo Bows."

In 2017, schools beyond the United Kingdom banned the bows, claiming they're too "distracting" in an educational setting, and Commonwealth of australia followed accommodate. The ban baffled many parents, but Siwa herself urged her fans to follow their school dress codes. "I call up that kids need to listen to their teachers and principals, merely at the aforementioned time, I retrieve that the fact that my bows are so pop is unbelievable!" she told The Sydney Morning Herald.

Lacy underwear

Shutterstock

Perhaps the strangest banned mode trend on this list is a modern ban on lacy underwear in Russian federation, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. Information technology's not the provocative nature of the garments themselves that these countries have a problem with. Instead, the ban is a condom measure that was put in identify in 2014.

Customs unions put the measures in place in order to protect wearers from skin issues caused by wearing clothing that doesn't absorb enough moisture. Under these measures, vesture that comes in contact with skin must comprise at to the lowest degree half dozen percent cotton fiber. That's bad news for lace and virtually other luxury lingerie, most of which is made of less than 4 per centum cotton. While the ban doesn't specifically make it illegal to own such article of clothing, it does bar their import and industry.

The de facto ban didn't sit well with the public who rapidly took to social media to post pictures of themselves wearing lacy undergarments. Several people were fifty-fifty detained in Kazakhstan afterward publicly protesting the brake.

Share this post